Precertification/authorization/notification/pre-treatment absent
What Does CARC 197 Mean?
CARC 197 — "Precertification/authorization/notification/pre-treatment absent" — is a Claim Adjustment Reason Code used by payers to indicate why a claim or service line was adjusted. This code falls under the Authorization category.
Common Causes
Here are the most common reasons this denial code appears on your remittance advice:
- Prior authorization was required but not obtained before the service
- Authorization number not included on the claim
- Authorization expired before the date of service
- Authorization was for a different procedure or quantity than what was billed
- Retrospective authorization request was denied or not submitted
Is CARC 197 Appealable?
Yes, CARC 197 is appealable. With proper documentation and a well-crafted appeal, this denial code has an estimated win rate of approximately 80.00%. This is one of the higher-success-rate denial codes — prioritize these appeals.
How to Appeal CARC 197
Follow these steps to maximize your chances of a successful appeal:
Related RARC Codes
These Remittance Advice Remark Codes are commonly paired with CARC 197. The RARC tells you the specific reason for the adjustment.
Appeal Letter Template
.DOCXCustomize the fields below to generate a ready-to-send appeal letter for CARC 197. Downloads as a formatted Word document.
Letter Body (editable)
Letter Preview
This is how your letter will look when downloaded
March 26, 2026
[Payer Name]
[Payer Address]
Dear Claims Review Department,
I am writing to formally appeal the denial of the above-referenced claim, denied with CARC 197: "Precertification/authorization/notification/pre-treatment absent".
Our appeal is based on the following:
- If authorization was obtained, resubmit with the correct auth number
- If authorization was missed, request a retrospective authorization from the payer
- Gather clinical documentation showing the service was medically necessary and urgent
- Check if the payer allows exceptions for emergency or urgent services
- File a formal appeal citing the clinical urgency and medical necessity
We have reviewed the common reasons for this denial and can confirm that the following do not apply to this claim:
- Prior authorization was required but not obtained before the service
- Authorization number not included on the claim
- Authorization expired before the date of service
- Authorization was for a different procedure or quantity than what was billed
- Retrospective authorization request was denied or not submitted
Recommended action: Check auth status; if obtained, resubmit with auth number. If missed, request retro-auth.
Enclosed please find supporting documentation for your review. We respectfully request reconsideration and payment of $[Denied Amount].
Sincerely,
[Provider Name]
[NPI] | [Phone]
[Practice/Organization Name]
Download Your Appeal Letter
Enter your email to download as a formatted Word document.